Securing Partner Supply Chains Act

Term Dictionary

If you come across any unfamiliar words while reading, these resources can help make everything clearer. Pick whichever one works best for you!

The gist

Directs the Secretary of State to create a 3-year program helping allied countries build their own systems to screen risky foreign investments in critical industries.

Who wins, who loses

  • Wins: US allies lacking screening tools, American companies in shared supply chains, national security officials.
  • Loses: foreign investors (especially from China, Russia) trying to acquire sensitive assets in partner nations.

What it does

  • Launches the Initiative on Foreign Investment Screening within 180 days; sunsets after 3 years.
  • Puts the Under Secretary for Economic Growth, Energy, and the Environment in charge.
  • Provides training, advisory services, and regulatory guidance to partner countries on investment screening.
  • Requires annual reports to Congress on progress, emerging risks, and which countries qualify as partners.

Why should I care?

Supporters say chips, batteries, and rare minerals all flow through allied nations — if adversaries buy those companies, US security suffers. Critics argue the State Department shouldn't push other countries to adopt US-style rules, and the program duplicates existing diplomatic work. Where do you land? Vote below and use "Tell Your Rep" to make sure your voice reaches Congress.

What do you think about this bill?

Vote to see who sponsored it!

Bill ID: hr7675-119
Congress Session: 119
Date Processed: 2026-02-27 04:28:51 (UTC)
Introduced: 2026-02-25
Status: Introduced