The gist

The bill rebuilds USDA's small organic cost-share program into a bigger system funding certification, farmer transition support, and supply chain growth through 2031.

Who wins, who loses

• Wins: small and mid-sized farmers, socially disadvantaged farmers, organic nonprofits, farms near schools.
• Loses: taxpayers funding the expansion; conventional pesticide and fertilizer suppliers facing more organic competition.

What it does

• Pays up to $1,500 per producer for organic certification costs, with higher amounts allowed in high-cost regions.
• Funds nonprofits to give 4-year, one-time transition grants covering equipment, soil testing, labor, and lost income.
• Boosts USDA technical assistance via extension programs, universities, and Tribal agriculture departments.
• Authorizes $50M (2027-2028), $80M (2029), and $100M (2030-2031) in spending.

Why should I care?

Supporters say organic farming protects soil, water, and kids living near sprayed fields while helping small farmers compete. Critics argue $360M over five years is steep for a niche market and that conventional farming already feeds more people cheaply. An alternative pushes broader conservation aid for all farmers, organic or not. Where do you land? Vote below and use "Tell Your Rep" to make sure your voice reaches Congress.