The gist

Bans filming, livestreaming, or publicly sharing military executions, and blocks federal money from being used to broadcast any execution to the public.

Who wins, who loses

• Wins: human-rights advocates, military-justice reformers, families of the condemned worried about public spectacle.
• Loses: media outlets seeking footage; officials who favor public broadcasts as deterrence or transparency.

What it does

• Adds Article 71 to the Uniform Code of Military Justice banning photos, video, audio, or livestreams of military executions.
• Prohibits posting execution footage on any government or private website or platform.
• Lets the Defense Secretary keep recordings only for investigations, courts, Congress, or archives.
• Bars all federal funds from publicizing any federal execution unless Congress or a court approves.

Why should I care?

Supporters say broadcasting executions turns justice into spectacle and risks trauma, copycat harm, and propaganda use. Critics argue the public has a right to see what the government does in its name, and transparency checks abuse. The debate shapes how democracies handle the harshest state power. Where do you land? Vote below and use "Tell Your Rep" to make sure your voice reaches Congress.