ICE and CBP Constitutional Accountability Act
Term Dictionary
If you come across any unfamiliar words while reading, these resources can help make everything clearer. Pick whichever one works best for you!
- Congress.gov Legislative Glossary - Comprehensive congressional terms
- NVFC Congressional Terms Glossary - Concise, easy-to-understand definitions
The gist
Creates a new right to sue the U.S. government when ICE or CBP agents violate constitutional rights like due process, free speech, or protection from illegal searches.
Who wins, who loses
Wins: people racially profiled or unlawfully searched by ICE/CBP, immigration attorneys, civil rights groups.
Loses: ICE and CBP agencies facing more lawsuits; Department of Homeland Security (DHS) budget paying judgments.
What it does
Amends the Federal Tort Claims Act to waive sovereign immunity for ICE and CBP misconduct cases.
Allows punitive damages, which the Federal Tort Claims Act normally bans.
Skips the usual requirement to file an administrative claim before suing.
Makes government liable even if the officer followed official DHS policy.
Why should I care?
Supporters say victims of racial profiling, illegal searches, or excessive force currently have almost no way to win against the federal government, and this bill fixes that gap. Critics argue it could flood courts with lawsuits, drain DHS funds, and discourage officers from enforcing immigration law. Where do you land? Vote below and use "Tell Your Rep" to make sure your voice reaches Congress.